You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can VerifyBamID be used to identify the source of contamination? That is, identifying the sample that is contaminating an intended sample.
For example, in a project with 100 EUR ancestry samples including sample X, let's assume that X is the source of contamination for 5 samples. VerifyBamID can be used to estimate the amount of contamination in those 5 samples, but can it also be used to identify which sample is the source of contamination?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ideally, this can be done by iteratively querying against each of these candidate samples. In practice, this might be related to the absolute depth and contamination level. This functionality has not been implemented yet.
@ManavalanG once you have the contamination estimate, you can extract a fingerprint for the contamination using Picard's ExtractFingerprint and then use (also Picard's) CrosscheckFingerprints to identify the source of contamination.
Can VerifyBamID be used to identify the source of contamination? That is, identifying the sample that is contaminating an intended sample.
For example, in a project with 100 EUR ancestry samples including sample X, let's assume that X is the source of contamination for 5 samples. VerifyBamID can be used to estimate the amount of contamination in those 5 samples, but can it also be used to identify which sample is the source of contamination?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: