Backup mode with recursive subvolumes #159
Labels
Comments
|
Hmm.
I'll leave this open for now. But I do recall there may be some problem
doing it from the other side, for some reason.
…On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:15 AM 6485im43 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to backup my dataset from my backup server.
No problem with zrep -S -f server01_pool2/kvm.
When I use zrep refresh no subvolumes are transferred.
Is it already possible to backup recursive with zrep refresh?
Thanks.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#159>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AANEV6O3YCVKLBJZKOLIOILRSK5BVANCNFSM4NFGENLQ>
.
|
janvrany
added a commit
to janvrany/zrep
that referenced
this issue
Feb 25, 2022
This commit add support for recursive `zrep refesh`. If `ZREP_R`
is set to `-R`, `zrep refresh` will pull all nested filesystems
just like `zrep sync` would do.
This is implemented by
* adding new (secret) top-level command - `_refreshsnap`
that takes `-R` option to indicate that `-r` should be used
when taking snapshot on source machine.
* fixing (existing, secret) `_refreshpull` to recognize
`-R` option to indicate full replication stream should be
generated
* fixing `zrep_refresh()` to pass `-R` to `_refreshsnap` and
`_refreshpull` when `ZREP_R` is set.
IIUC, this fixes issue bolthole#159
|
please check latest to see if this fixes things for you |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
I'm trying to backup my dataset from my backup server.
No problem with zrep -S -f server01_pool2/kvm.
When I use zrep refresh no subvolumes are transferred.
Is it already possible to backup recursive with zrep refresh?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: