Submit ghcjs-base to hackage

[crocket]

@hamishmack confirmed that ghcjs-boot libraries do not depend on ghcjs-base, so it should be safe to use any version of ghcjs-base from hackage.

I think I can handle this one after #77 is merged.

I'll try to add anyone, who is enthusiastic and doesn't look malicious or crazy to me, to the maintainer list of ghcjs-base on hackage.

[tysonzero]

Any update on this? It would be nice to have this in Hackage.

[tysonzero]

@hamishmack @crocket Bump. Is this happening any time soon? I would really like to have ghcjs-base on hackage.

[luite]

yes, the boot libraries for ghcjs on ghc 8.2 won't contain ghcjs-base anymore

[nomeata]

Can we have ghcjs-base on hackage? It is a dependency of jsaddle, which is on hackage, for example.

[Ericson2314]

@luite you mean ghcjs-base is gone altogether? We could remove it from jsaddlethen. CC @matthewbauer

[nomeata]

Of course if ghcjs-base is no longer needed for jaddle, then an upload to Hackage may not be that important.

[nomeata]

reflex and related packages were updated on hackage, but depend on ghcjs-base:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/reflex-0.5/reflex.cabal

While it is possible to use reflex with GHC without using ghcjs-base, it is still required for building when GHCJS, it seems, to having ghcjs-base on hackage too would be nice.

[nomeata]

Independent of reflex, it seems that jsaddle-dom depends on ghcjs-base.

[Ericson2314]

CC @luigy

[hamishmack]

I have uploaded latest master branch to hackage.