Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added support for including the reasoning process in the output of Reasoning Model. #12891

Open
4 of 5 tasks
kevintsai1202 opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #12949
Open
4 of 5 tasks

Added support for including the reasoning process in the output of Reasoning Model. #12891

kevintsai1202 opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #12949
Labels
💪 enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kevintsai1202
Copy link

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue,否则会被关闭。谢谢!:)
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

The output data of DeepSeek R1 includes the reasoning process, featuring a reasoning_content field.
However, current LLM models only provide the final output result in the content field.
It is desired to add support for the reasoning_content field, allowing the option to display the reasoning process during chats to be toggled on or off.

2. Additional context or comments

https://api-docs.deepseek.com/guides/reasoning_model

Image

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
@dosubot dosubot bot added the 💪 enhancement New feature or request label Jan 21, 2025
@hjlarry hjlarry mentioned this issue Jan 22, 2025
5 tasks
@BATTLEHAWK00
Copy link

Also, I think a node is needed to separate thinking process from the real answer

@hjlarry hjlarry linked a pull request Jan 22, 2025 that will close this issue
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
💪 enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants