-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Future async compatibility #96
Comments
Hi. Yes I'd like to support that BUT @gil-obradors do you have any experience with asyncio ? |
Hi ! Sorry for the delay. I have teorical knowloedges, but not real experience, more than use frameworks that are ready for async like starlette, My conclusion after some mental loops that I have thinked last days...
Trio is a tool for create and manage async app, with event loop... This would be for the second point that I have described. I'm wrong? Gil |
No need to implement event loop. This is already provided in |
possible roadmaps:
I will keep thinking about how to deal with this. I'm getting inspired with pysnmp, that you can run async or sync requests as you want : |
Keep in mind that it is impossible to be 100% DRY with both synchronous and async code. Some parts (if not a lot of them) will have to be wrote twice. |
Hi @gil-obradors, Sorry do not know if this is an old topic, this is library is only something I have only just found while attempting to automate my mikrotik network. What I am doing in order to speed up my process I am using python threading and a thread per device it may be a way to increase performance Regards, TFH |
PR #303 should solve this |
Any intentions to convert to async compatible package?
I'm learning about it....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: