You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
I expect that pgcat has to be more performant than pgbouncer at least due multithreading, but seem like it is not. I've run simple syntetic test, see below. I need to get TPS value high as much as possible. And no matter what pool size I set for pfgcat and how many workers, pgbouncer has always an advantage in TPS. To Reproduce
Install pgcat and configure with pool size 100, workers = 2
Install pgbouncer set pool size 100
Run pgbench from another VM pgbench -c 100 -j 2 -t 1000 db -h IP -p 6433|6432 -U user
Expected behavior
TPS higher than for pgbouncer
Screenshots
n/a Desktop (please complete the following information):
Ubuntu 22.04
Hetzner VM cx22
Test results:
both tools configured to transaction mode. Pool size set 100 for pgcat and pgbouncer, max_connection set to 200.
# pgcat
transaction type: <builtin: TPC-B (sort of)>
scaling factor: 50
query mode: simple
number of clients: 100
number of threads: 2
number of transactions per client: 1000
number of transactions actually processed: 100000/100000
latency average = 118.267 ms
initial connection time = 102.550 ms
tps = 845.546899 (without initial connection time)
# pgbouncer
transaction type: <builtin: TPC-B (sort of)>
scaling factor: 50
query mode: simple
number of clients: 100
number of threads: 2
number of transactions per client: 1000
number of transactions actually processed: 100000/100000
latency average = 110.804 ms
initial connection time = 148.209 ms
tps = 902.494788 (without initial connection time)
# postgresql
transaction type: <builtin: TPC-B (sort of)>
scaling factor: 50
query mode: simple
number of clients: 100
number of threads: 2
number of transactions per client: 1000
number of transactions actually processed: 100000/100000
latency average = 114.526 ms
initial connection time = 956.368 ms
tps = 873.167031 (without initial connection time)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
I expect that pgcat has to be more performant than pgbouncer at least due multithreading, but seem like it is not. I've run simple syntetic test, see below. I need to get TPS value high as much as possible. And no matter what pool size I set for pfgcat and how many workers, pgbouncer has always an advantage in TPS.
To Reproduce
pgbench
from another VMpgbench -c 100 -j 2 -t 1000 db -h IP -p 6433|6432 -U user
Expected behavior
TPS higher than for pgbouncer
Screenshots
n/a
Desktop (please complete the following information):
Test results:
both tools configured to
transaction
mode. Pool size set 100 for pgcat and pgbouncer, max_connection set to 200.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: