We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#[specta(transparent)]
Given we have moved inline to userspace it would make sense.
I think the other big reason is that Type::definition is infallible and having a recursively transparent type would yield an error.
Type::definition
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Given we have moved inline to userspace it would make sense.
I think the other big reason is that
Type::definition
is infallible and having a recursively transparent type would yield an error.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: