Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Logitech Option+ is not installable using chocolatey behind a corporate proxy #14

Open
yelkarama opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@yelkarama
Copy link

Logitech Option+ is not installable using chocolatey behind a corporate proxy

Expected Behavior

choco install logioptionsplus should be able to install Logitech Option+ on a machine behind a corporate proxy

Current Behavior

Elevating permissions and running ["C:\Users\xxxxx\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\logioptionsplus\1.66.531337\logioptionsplus_installer.exe" /quiet ]. This may take a while, depending on the statements. Command ["C:\Users\xxxxx\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\logioptionsplus\1.66.531337\logioptionsplus_installer.exe" /quiet ] exited with '1287'. ERROR: Running ["C:\Users\xxxxx\AppData\Local\Temp\chocolatey\logioptionsplus\1.66.531337\logioptionsplus_installer.exe" /quiet ] was not successful. Exit code was '1287'. See log for possible error messages.

Possible Solution

Use the offline installer

Ref

Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)

  1. choco install logioptionsplus

Context

Unable to use chocolatey to install/update Logitech Option+ on my work laptop

Your Environment

  • Package Version used: 1.66.531337
  • Operating System and version: Windows 10 Enterprise
  • Chocolatey version: v2.2.2
  • Install/uninstall gist:
@virtualex-itv
Copy link
Owner

Have you tested the installation using the offline installer to verify that it is not also blocked by your corp proxy? There are some caveats to using the offline installer which is why I chose not to use it and I'm not going to change which installer is used for a one-off case like this. You can always create a local package with the offline installer and maintain it yourself.

@virtualex-itv virtualex-itv added question Further information is requested wontfix This will not be worked on labels May 16, 2024
@yelkarama
Copy link
Author

Sorry to hear that..
Cheers,

@yelkarama yelkarama closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 31, 2024
@virtualex-itv
Copy link
Owner

No need to apologize. I will take a further look at this and consider changing to the offline installer or creating a new package entirely that uses the offline installer. But I was awaiting a response from you to my question before taking further action.

@virtualex-itv virtualex-itv removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jun 1, 2024
@virtualex-itv virtualex-itv reopened this Jun 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants