Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AMReX SoA Named Components #382

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

ax3l
Copy link
Member

@ax3l ax3l commented Oct 12, 2024

Replace our own named SoA particle components implementation with the now upstream support in AMReX. Early draft, unfinished.

@ax3l ax3l added the API: breaking Breaking changes label Oct 12, 2024
@ax3l ax3l requested a review from atmyers October 12, 2024 00:17
@ax3l ax3l added the component: particles Particles label Oct 12, 2024
@ax3l ax3l changed the title [Draft] AMReX SoA Named Components [WIP] AMReX SoA Named Components Oct 12, 2024
@ax3l ax3l force-pushed the topic-upstream-soa-named branch from d41d068 to a3b79d3 Compare January 14, 2025 19:07
@ax3l ax3l force-pushed the topic-upstream-soa-named branch from a3b79d3 to 4add429 Compare January 14, 2025 20:15
src/Particle/StructOfArrays.H Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/test_particleContainer.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
atmyers pushed a commit to AMReX-Codes/amrex that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
## Summary

We forgot a `define()` that also needs to forward the names of SoA
components. This fixes it.

## Additional background

First seen in AMReX-Codes/pyamrex#382

## Checklist

The proposed changes:
- [x] fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
- [ ] add new capabilities to AMReX
- [ ] changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
- [ ] are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX
users
- [ ] include documentation in the code and/or rst files, if appropriate
ax3l added a commit to ax3l/pyamrex that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
Update to latest commit in `development`.
Pull in fix AMReX-Codes/amrex#4298
for AMReX-Codes#382.
@ax3l ax3l force-pushed the topic-upstream-soa-named branch from 4add429 to 6a66b61 Compare January 18, 2025 01:06
atmyers pushed a commit to AMReX-Codes/amrex that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2025
## Summary

Avoid user errors. Happened immediately to me: I added a runtime
component with the same name as a compile-time SoA component and no
error was thrown (now it will).

## Additional background

AMReX-Codes/pyamrex#382

## Checklist

The proposed changes:
- [x] fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX
- [ ] add new capabilities to AMReX
- [ ] changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level
- [ ] are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX
users
- [ ] include documentation in the code and/or rst files, if appropriate
ax3l added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2025
Update to latest commit in `development`.
Pull in fixes
- [x] AMReX-Codes/amrex#4298
- [x] AMReX-Codes/amrex#4299
- [x] AMReX-Codes/amrex#4302
- [x] AMReX-Codes/amrex#4300

for #382.
Replace our own named SoA particle components implementation
with the now upstream support in AMReX.
@ax3l ax3l force-pushed the topic-upstream-soa-named branch from 6a66b61 to 0585d17 Compare January 23, 2025 07:35
@ax3l ax3l changed the title [WIP] AMReX SoA Named Components AMReX SoA Named Components Jan 23, 2025
tests/test_particleContainer.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Axel Huebl <[email protected]>
@ax3l
Copy link
Member Author

ax3l commented Jan 23, 2025

@atmyers this PR and the ImpactX PR are ready for review :)

@ax3l ax3l merged commit 6d9b9da into AMReX-Codes:development Jan 24, 2025
18 checks passed
@ax3l ax3l deleted the topic-upstream-soa-named branch January 24, 2025 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API: breaking Breaking changes component: particles Particles
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants