Update README: Move Neo4J Storage Section for Better Visibility #348
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Move `Using Neo4J for Storage` content outside of Ollama details group for improved visibility to this option.
donbr
changed the title
|
Should we update the LightRAG init parameters table with a consistent parameter name for KG storage?
|
|
Yes, the parameter name has already been unified in the source code, but the demo was mistakenly not updated. I will fix it ASAP. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using Neo4J for Storagesection was originally nested inside the Ollama details block, making it less visible to users looking for KG storage options.