Ensure compatibility with Java 21 #1615
Conversation
l-1squared
force-pushed
the
support-java-21
branch
7 times, most recently
from
6d0e5ea to
b35839d
Compare
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
l-1squared
force-pushed
the
support-java-21
branch
from
65748ba to
e646154
Compare
Signed-off-by: l-1squared <[email protected]>
l-1squared
force-pushed
the
support-java-21
branch
from
0aa31e2 to
6ed712f
Compare
| @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| ANDROID: true | |||
| strategy: | |||
| matrix: | |||
| java: [ '11', '17', '19'] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
19 will be omitted completely?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, 19 was not an LTS release and is thus not supported anymore. Once I've got this, I'd also like to add the two newest versions.
| @@ -1,10 +1,12 @@ | |||
| # Release v2.0.0 | |||
| ## Breaking changes | |||
| ## Backward incompatible changes | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, backward incompatible with respect to...? It's a bit confusing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the previous version. I refraine from using "breaking" because I hope that the changes do not actually break anything
(Java 17 is pretty much required if you do java by now, and the gradle issue should only affect some fringe cases). therefore I wanted to use less agressive wording
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I mean, it's just wording in the end, but "breaking changes" is somehow "well-known"; the new wording seems... a bit off. But probably it's rather on my side than a general issue ;)
No description provided.