Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Incorrect booking 500s #18784

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

keithwillcode
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

These rate limit exceptions were causing 500s to be returned from the server, which is incorrect. They need to return as 429 directly from the origin server.

Mandatory Tasks (DO NOT REMOVE)

  • I have self-reviewed the code (A decent size PR without self-review might be rejected).
  • N/A I have updated the developer docs in /docs if this PR makes changes that would require a documentation change. If N/A, write N/A here and check the checkbox.
  • I confirm automated tests are in place that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.

@keithwillcode keithwillcode self-assigned this Jan 21, 2025
@keithwillcode keithwillcode added this to the v5.0 milestone Jan 21, 2025
@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from a team January 21, 2025 15:11
@keithwillcode keithwillcode added core area: core, team members only foundation labels Jan 21, 2025
@dosubot dosubot bot added bookings area: bookings, availability, timezones, double booking 🐛 bug Something isn't working labels Jan 21, 2025
Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Graphite Automations

"Add foundation team as reviewer" took an action on this PR • (01/21/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Keith Williams's automation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bookings area: bookings, availability, timezones, double booking 🐛 bug Something isn't working core area: core, team members only foundation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant