Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed Go Formatting Issue #63

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2024
Merged

Fixed Go Formatting Issue #63

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

rishabhatdell
Copy link
Contributor

@rishabhatdell rishabhatdell commented Feb 23, 2024

Description

This PR fixes the "Workflow / Check Go formatting, linting, vetting" Issues

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#1091

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have maintained backward compatibility

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Ran cert-csi:
    image

@rishabhatdell rishabhatdell changed the title fixing github actions#1 Fixed Go Formatting Issue Feb 23, 2024
@rishabhatdell rishabhatdell marked this pull request as ready for review February 23, 2024 08:18
@adarsh-dell adarsh-dell merged commit 0ec9fb7 into main Feb 23, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants