iox-#2301 Windows 32 bit fixes

[elBoberido]

Notes for Reviewer

Pre-Review Checklist for the PR Author

1. Code follows the coding style of CONTRIBUTING.md
2. Tests follow the best practice for testing
3. Changelog updated in the unreleased section including API breaking changes
4. Branch follows the naming format (iox-123-this-is-a-branch)
5. Commits messages are according to this guideline
   • Commit messages have the issue ID (iox-#123 commit text)
   • Commit author matches Eclipse Contributor Agreement (and ECA is signed)
6. Update the PR title
   • Follow the same conventions as for commit messages
   • Link to the relevant issue
7. Relevant issues are linked
8. Add sensible notes for the reviewer
9. All checks have passed (except task-list-completed)
10. Assign PR to reviewer

Checklist for the PR Reviewer

• Consider a second reviewer for complex new features or larger refactorings
• Commits are properly organized and messages are according to the guideline
• Code according to our coding style and naming conventions
• Unit tests have been written for new behavior
• Public API changes are documented via doxygen
• Copyright owner are updated in the changed files
• All touched (C/C++) source code files from iceoryx_hoofs have been added to ./clang-tidy-diff-scans.txt
• PR title describes the changes

Post-review Checklist for the PR Author

1. All open points are addressed and tracked via issues

References

• Relates to 32-Bit Support #2301

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.70%. Comparing base (e088257) to head (85a9726).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2404   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.69%   78.70%           
=======================================
  Files         440      440           
  Lines       16981    16981           
  Branches     2361     2361           
=======================================
+ Hits        13364    13365    +1     
  Misses       2736     2736           
+ Partials      881      880    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	78.50% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unittests_timing	15.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[elfenpiff]

there is no counterpart

[elBoberido]

No, not as flag but it seems we are lucky and MSVC puts at least atomics on 8 byte boundaries