Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lazify compute_smoothness #756

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

matthiasdiener
Copy link
Member

@matthiasdiener matthiasdiener commented Sep 19, 2022

Should address #754.

Questions for the review:

  • Is the scope and purpose of the PR clear?
    • The PR should have a description.
    • The PR should have a guide if needed (e.g., an ordering).
  • Is every top-level method and class documented? Are things that should be documented actually so?
  • Is the interface understandable? (I.e. can someone figure out what stuff does?) Is it well-defined?
  • Does the implementation do what the docstring claims?
  • Is everything that is implemented covered by tests?
  • Do you see any immediate risks or performance disadvantages with the design? Example: what do interface normals attach to?

@matthiasdiener
Copy link
Member Author

matthiasdiener commented Sep 20, 2022

Closing in favor of #758.

@matthiasdiener matthiasdiener deleted the compute_smoothness-lazy branch September 20, 2022 03:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant