Add supplementary data

_toc.yml

@@ -4,4 +4,11 @@
 format: jb-book
 root: index
 parts:
+  - caption: Supplementary Data
+    chapters:
+    - file: supplementary/supplementary-data-1-application-template.md
+    - file: supplementary/supplementary-data-2-review-rubric.md
+    - file: supplementary/supplementary-data-3-mid-term-participant-survey.md
+    - file: supplementary/supplementary-data-4-post-cohort-participant-survey.md
+    - file: supplementary/supplementary-data-5-post-cohort-mentor-survey.md
 

supplementary/supplementary-data-1-application-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+# Supplementary Data 1: Open Seeds Application Template
+
+**_* denotes a required field_**
+
+## Title *
+
+_Project Name. Please note that your project doesn’t have to be technical — it can be a curriculum (open educational resource), an open data project, documentation or report, an open source software project, open publication, community building, team culture movements, or anything else that supports openness in research communities, have something to work on (a feature, module, or minimum viable product) during the program and allows and welcomes contributions by others. Whether your project is just an idea at this stage or something that’s been running for years, all applications are welcome._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## TL;DR
+
+_A short sentence describing your proposal_
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Authors *
+
+_Search author profile by first, middle and last name or email address. If the profile is not found, you can add the author by completing first, middle, and last names as well as the author email address._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Country *
+
+_Country of residence. Comma-separated list of countries, if different for different authors._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Affiliation *
+
+Please provide the affiliation under which your project will be developed. **For independent research please use - Independent**. Comma-separated list of affiliation, if different for different authors.
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Pronouns
+
+_Please share preferred pronouns (optional). Comma-separated list of pronouns, if different for different authors._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Keywords
+
+_Comma-separated list of keywords that best describe the research and interest areas of your project._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Project *
+
+_Describe your project in a maximum of 200 words. You can use MarkDown formatting (see:[ https://commonmark.org/help/](https://commonmark.org/help/))._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Problem *
+
+_What problem(s) are you solving with this project? Please describe in a maximum of 200 words. You can use MarkDown formatting (see:[ https://commonmark.org/help/](https://commonmark.org/help/))._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Achievements *
+
+_What concrete achievements do you want to accomplish during the OLS program? Please describe in a maximum of 200 words. You can use MarkDown formatting (see:[ https://commonmark.org/help/](https://commonmark.org/help/))._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Status *
+
+_What is the current status of your project or work? **Choose one option**_
+
+* I have a great idea
+* Working towards a first prototype
+* Just launched first prototype
+* Working on new release/feature on an existing prototype
+* Maintaining work on an existing prototype
+
+
+## Goal *
+
+_Where would you like to be after the OLS program? **Choose one option**_
+
+* I have a great idea
+* Working towards a first prototype
+* Just launched first prototype
+* Working on new release/feature on an existing prototype
+* Maintaining work on an existing prototype
+
+
+## Open *
+
+_What inspires you to work openly in research? Please respond in a maximum of 200 words. You can use MarkDown formatting (see:[ https://commonmark.org/help/](https://commonmark.org/help/))._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Challenges *
+
+_What challenges have you faced in working in open science? Please respond in a maximum of 200 words. You can use MarkDown formatting (see:[ https://commonmark.org/help/](https://commonmark.org/help/))._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Learning *
+
+_What are your learning goals in the Open Life Science program? Please respond in a maximum of 200 words. You can use MarkDown formatting (see:[ https://commonmark.org/help/](https://commonmark.org/help/))._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Community *
+
+_What community/communities are you working with or have worked with in the past? Please note this could be any type of community in the context of academia, research, industry or something in your neighbourhood. Tell us about your experience working with this community, such as the nature of your involvement and aspects of community participation you liked or disliked. If you haven't worked with any community before, tell us why you are interest in being part of our diverse community. Please respond in a maximum of 250 words. You can use MarkDown formatting (see:[ https://commonmark.org/help/](https://commonmark.org/help/))._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Mentor *
+
+_What do you expect from a mentor? Please respond in a maximum of 200 words. You can use MarkDown formatting (see:[ https://commonmark.org/help/](https://commonmark.org/help/))._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Other OLS applications *
+
+_Have you applied to OLS before, or are you applying as an author on more than one project in this round of applications? If yes, please share the project name and which round(s) you applied to OLS in, e.g. "OLS, Open Science Writing Guide"._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Accessibility *
+
+_The OLS team aims to create as inclusive an environment as possible for everyone. To help us prepare effectively, please let us know if there is anything we can do to facilitate your participation. This might include sign interpreters for video calls, alternative format materials, or something else. We will provide real-time captioning using otter.ai and/or Google Slides by default. This information will not be shared with application reviewers, and will not affect whether or not you are accepted to the program._
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Language *
+
+_What spoken language do you prefer for your mentoring calls?_
+
+<your answer>
+
+
+## Scheme *
+
+_Are you affiliated with any of these organisations? **Choose one option**_
+
+* EOSC-Life
+* The Turing Way/The Alan Turing Institute
+* TU Delft - Faculty of Applied Sciences
+* VU Amsterdam
+* CZI
+* Not sure
+* None

supplementary/supplementary-data-2-review-rubric.md

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+# Supplementary Data 2: Open Seeds Application Review Rubric for Selection of Applications
+
+_This document describes the rubric our mentors use to review all the applications. Our applicants may have a look at this to ensure that they are aware of the criteria their applications will be assessed against._
+
+
+## Rubric for Reviewers
+
+_Review of all applications will be scored between 1 and 3 for 'Readiness' for the program, 'Goals' of the projects, 'Openness' in the context of Open Science and 'Willingness' to learn. Applicants who mostly score 1s are not ready for the program and may not understand the work, the overall goals of Open Science and openness in general, how openness promotes community engagement, or how to be while learning in the community or through mentorship. Applicants who score 2s are enthusiastic if not wholly ready for the work, have a personal or professional goal to be more open (in general) and are ready to learn about Open Science from experts, mentors, and peers alike. Applicants who score 3s are ready, goal-oriented, interested in applying Open Science to their work, and excited to learn from experts, mentors, and peers alike. Please check 'I understand' to proceed._
+
+
+* I understand
+
+
+### Project title as provided by the applicants
+
+[Open text]
+
+
+### Scores between 1 and 3:
+
+1. Applicants who score 1s are not ready for the program and may not understand the work, the overall goals of Open Science and openness in general, how openness promotes community engagement, or how to be while learning in the community or through mentorship.
+2. Applicants who score 2s are enthusiastic if not wholly ready for the work, have a personal or professional goal to be more open (in general) and are ready to learn about Open Science from experts, mentors, and peers alike.
+3. Applicants who score 3s are clearly ready, goal-oriented, interested in applying Open Science to their work, and excited to learn from experts, mentors, and peers alike.
+
+
+## Criteria
+
+### Readiness for the program
+
+_Are the candidate and their project ready for the OLS training and mentoring?_
+
+1. (not ready) Does not provide enough information or seems to misunderstand the nature of the program or of Open Science, in general
+2. (enthusiastic) Seems to have a clear understanding of the program and brings along a specific project or idea for one
+3. (clear) Seems to have a clear understanding of the program and a clear understanding of how it might help open their work in academia
+
+
+### Goals
+
+_Has the candidate clearly defined some goals in their project and from their participation in OLS?_
+
+1. (not ready) Shares vague or general goals, goals that are unrelated to Open Science, or no goals at all
+2. (enthusiastic) Shares clear, overly ambitious goals related to Open Science that can likely be managed and revised during the program
+3. (clear) Shares clear, achievable goals related to Open Science that fit the program and are likely to be met through the applicant’s participation. 
+
+
+### Openness and Open Science
+
+_Is the candidate keen to learn and apply open science practices, both technically and through the involvement from an open community?_
+
+1. (not ready) Goals and purposes for the program seem almost entirely self-centered and about the applicant’s status, rather than about opening their community or project.
+2. (enthusiastic) Goals and purposes for the program address openness, but in a general or limited way, like creating an openly licensed product instead of building an open community of contribution
+3. (clear) Goals and purposes for the program address openness in many ways and are likely to help the applicant empower others to work open and become open leaders in their own rights. \
+
+
+### Willingness to learn
+
+_Is the candidate willing to practice open science in and beyond their work in OLS?_
+
+1. (not ready) Seems closed to new ways of working or more interested in open-washing a publication or project than in learning about working Open Science
+2. (enthusiastic) Seems excited to learn about working open in science, but in a general way without much understanding of what those things mean yet
+3. (clear) Seems excited to learn about working open and joining the Open Science movement to join and advocate the Open Science movement \
+
+
+### Community
+
+_Does the candidate have an understanding of working with an open science community? In their response have they shown their commitment to or understanding of Equity, Diversity, Inclusion and Accessibility (EDIA) aspects that they could draw from when working with diverse communities as OLS?_
+
+1. (not ready) Seem not to have an understanding of what working with a diverse community in open science may entail
+2. (enthusiastic) Seems excited to learn about working with the community, but in a general way without much understanding of what considerations for EDI may involve
+3. (clear) Seems excited to learn about working with the community and bring a commitment to and/or understanding of EDIA concerns
+
+
+### Recommendation
+
+_Would you recommend this applicant and their project for their participation in the upcoming Open Seed OLS cohort?_
+
+* Yes: I would like to recommend this application
+* No: I would not like to recommend this application
+* Unsure: I can not make an informed recommendation for this application
+
+
+#### Mentoring preference
+
+_Would you like to mentor this project if they are the right match for you and if the candidate is accepted to participate in OLS?_
+
+1. Top preference
+2. Second preference
+3. Third preference
+
+
+#### Summary
+
+Please provide a short sentence capturing the main theme of this project and insights from your review of this application. This will particularly help the OLS team and potential mentors choosing this application if you would recommend this application, but are not willing to mentor this applicant.
+
+[Open Text]