Update index.en.md #54
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Review of interview content
jcolomb
requested changes
May 31, 2024
Yes, sounds fair Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
jcolomb
reviewed
Jun 4, 2024
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
|
Hi @jcolomb I guess we're aligned on the content and it seems the points have been progressed - how do we move to the next step? Thanks again and cheers |
|
Do you want to discuss the last 2 points live ? (Then I will merge things and put it online) |
kelu124
commented
Sep 16, 2024
| Coming back to the decisions, I don't have a roadmap. It's just what is fun at the moment. The perfect example is what we'd like to do with open MRI initiative. The challenge is to find common themes between MRI and ultrasound. There is an intellectual challenge there. That has driven the decision of pursuing something together. | ||
| As this is an informal community, there is virtually no governance nor governance processes. From a technical perspective, people making the decisions are people doing. They make decisions based on their requirements. | ||
|
|
||
| Even on collaborating with, for example, organisations. The process is that these organisations drive their requirement, and we discuss opportunities and past learnings. To some extent, they drive the decision of the joint project. I then bring back to the community what can be shared back. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Proposing the below:
I sometimes collaborate with organisations. These organisations share their requirements, and we discuss past learning and opportunities to improve. They lead on the decision of the joint project, which, when possible, can be brought back to the community, if they develop new things that come back to the project. The agreement is that I advise them on the points they do not know, and in exchange, they put technical and professional skills into this joint effort. A good example is the latest iteration of lit3rick board. It has been co-designed by professionals from a Canadian institution. They have come in with specific needs, but also excellent electrical engineers, and together we optimized the previous iteration.
jcolomb
reviewed
Sep 16, 2024
| Coming back to the decisions, I don't have a roadmap. It's just what is fun at the moment. The perfect example is what we'd like to do with open MRI initiative. The challenge is to find common themes between MRI and ultrasound. There is an intellectual challenge there. That has driven the decision of pursuing something together. | ||
| As this is an informal community, there is virtually no governance nor governance processes. From a technical perspective, people making the decisions are people doing. They make decisions based on their requirements. | ||
|
|
||
| Even on collaborating with, for example, organisations. The process is that these organisations drive their requirement, and we discuss opportunities and past learnings. To some extent, they drive the decision of the joint project. I then bring back to the community what can be shared back. |
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Julien Colomb <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposition of text review =)