Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refine combiner usage #1097

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025
Merged

Refine combiner usage #1097

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

MattWellie
Copy link
Contributor

See https://hail.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/123010-Hail-Query-0.2E2-support/topic/gVCF.20Combiner.20Save.20Path.2FPlan: A partial combiner run can only be resumed when the first step completes (gVCF -> VDS)

We're having issues reaching that point. See also hail-is/hail#14781 - the parameters do not currently work as they should.

This change gives us granularity to change any of the combiner attributes relating to the degree of parallelisation of work at each stage

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 26.72%. Comparing base (49e1ea5) to head (18afa28).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1097   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   26.72%   26.72%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines        1729     1729           
=======================================
  Hits          462      462           
  Misses       1267     1267           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@MattWellie MattWellie merged commit fcc5135 into main Jan 10, 2025
4 checks passed
@MattWellie MattWellie deleted the Refine_Combiner_Usage branch January 10, 2025 00:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants