-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Import definitions via xrefs #169
Conversation
Great! Just note the issue #159 with non-exact InterPro mappings. |
@bgyori I just reorganized to have a priority list and make this a bit more flexible |
@bgyori this isn't a perfect PR and won't be so easy to re-run until I re-release PyOBO with some fixes (unless you want to install pyobo in the development mdoe), but it gets the job done of adding 424 descriptions (~60% of famplexes). I made a priority list (which you can feel free to change) where interpro is at the bottom - only one entry gets assigned a name that way. But it gets a lot of the job done, so it might be okay to think about merging now. Let me know what you think |
I think this is really great, the descriptions all look appropriate! |
Closes #168 |
This PR adds a script that pulls in definitions using new (unreleased) pyobo code from (biopragmatics/pyobo#98 - once I fix the mocks in the testing I will merge it). It prioritizes getting the definitions for famplex entries based on their xrefs in the following order: