Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #267, explain why we are not using JSON Path or JSON Pointer #295

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

danielfett
Copy link
Member

@danielfett danielfett commented Jan 13, 2025

Fix #267

@@ -1001,6 +1001,13 @@ selectively disclosable claims were disclosed to a Verifier. That means that a
consuming application which does not have access to all disclosures may not be
able to identify the claim which is being addressed.

Note: This specification intentionally does not use JSON Pointer [@RFC6901] for
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's be explicit about the "?"ness

Suggested change
Note: This specification intentionally does not use JSON Pointer [@RFC6901] for
Note: This specification intentionally does not use JSON Pointer [@?RFC6901] for

Comment on lines +1007 to +1009
that introduces a considerable complexity and brings in a lot of features that
are not needed for the use case of selecting claims in a credential. There are
also security concerns with some implementations.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

editorial nit

Suggested change
that introduces a considerable complexity and brings in a lot of features that
are not needed for the use case of selecting claims in a credential. There are
also security concerns with some implementations.
that introduces a considerable complexity and brings in many features which
are not needed for the use case of selecting claims in a credential. There are
also security concerns with some implementations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document reasons for not using existing JSON query languages
3 participants